Reflections and recommendations on psychological safety in undergraduate simulation-based education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5354/2452-5839.2024.74780Keywords:
Psychological Safety, High Fidelity Simulation Training, Simulation Training, Medical Education, Nursing EducationAbstract
Objective: To propose recommendations for promoting psychological safety in simulation practice based on educators’ experiences and an analysis of the concept in simulation-based education. Development: Psychological safety originates as a concept meant for teamwork. Subsequently, models for individual and vertical relationships are identified, where personal safety is related to that of others and factors that influence it are recognized, along with their effects. In the educational context, psychological safety is understood as creating a safe environment for learning, which facilitates the development of conversations without fear of humiliation or mistreatment. An adaptation of Clark's four levels to undergraduate education is proposed. Individual student factors such as a proactive personality, emotional stability, and orientation to learning are identified, as well as contextual factors like high quality relationships and student support systems. The relevance of ‘Grit’ as a concept is highlighted, as well as its relation to psychological safety. Additionally, ruptures in psychological safety during debriefing are detected, and we present strategies to prevent and repair them. The importance of educator training and continuous improvement is emphasized. Conclusions: Managing psychological safety is a challenge that requires an understanding of the concept and relies on specific strategies that educators can access in advance, during a learning scenario, or in the debriefing process, for which training is a key element.
References
Bastías-Vega N, Pérez-Villalobos C, Alvarado-Figueroa D, Schilling-Norman MJ, Espinoza-Riffo M, Parra-Ponce P, et al. Maltrato en el pregrado de la carrera de Medicina: percepción de los estudiantes. Rev. méd. Chile. 2021;149(4):617-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872021000400617
Superintendencia de Educación Superior. Superintendente Salazar recibe a madre de Catalina Cayazaya y anuncia que mañana la Universidad de los Andes entregará a la SES informe solicitado. 9 de abril 2024. Santiago de Chile. https://www.sesuperior.cl/es_cl/noticias/superintendente-salazar-recibe-a-madre-de-catalina-cayazaya-y-anuncia-que-manana-la-universidad-de-los-andes-entregara-a-la-ses-informe-solicitado/
Somerville SG, Harrison NM, Lewis SA. Twelve tips for the pre-brief to promote psychological safety in simulation-based education. Med Teach. 2023;45(12):1349-1356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2214305.
Kolbe M, Eppich, W, Rudolph J, Meguerdichian M, Catena H, Cripps A, Grant V, Cheng A. Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020;6(3):164–171. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470
Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal. 1990;33(4):692–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256287
Edmondson, A. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999;44(2):350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Tynan R. The effects of threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological safety and upward communication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2006;35(2):223-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02119.x
Carmeli A, Brueller D, Dutton JE. Learning behaviours in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2009;26(1):81-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.932
Zhang Y, Fang Y, Wei KK, Chen H. Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management. 2010;30(5):425-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.003
May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2004;77(1):11–37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(7):941–966. doi: 10.1002/job.413.
Caverzagie KJ, Goldenberg MG, Hall JM. Psychology and learning: The role of the clinical learning environment. Med Teach. 2019;41(4):375-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1567910
Kim S, Lee H, Connerton TP. How Psychological Safety Affects Team Performance: Mediating Role of Efficacy and Learning Behavior. Front Psychol. 2020(11):1581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01581
Clark T. The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety: Defining the Path to Inclusion and Innovation. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2020.
Duckworth A, Gross JJ. Self-Control and Grit: Related but Separable Determinants of Success. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2014;23(5):319–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414541462
Datu JAD. Beyond Passion and Perseverance: Review and Future Research Initiatives on the Science of Grit. Front. psychol. 2021;11:545526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.545526
Sessions LC, Kim HJ, Brewer KC, El-Banna MM, Farina CL. Intrinsic Factors and Psychological Safety Among Nursing Students During Simulation-Based Learning-A Correlational Design. Simul Healthc. 2024;9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000795
Ortiz Sánchez AG, Olvera Cortés HE. Debriefing difícil: antes, durante y después de situaciones desafiantes. RevSimCS. 2024;1(2):243-48.
Armijo-Rivera S, Machuca-Contreras F, Raul N, de Oliveira SN, Mendoza IB, Miyasato HS, Díaz-Guio DA. Characterization of simulation centers and programs in Latin America according to the ASPIRE and SSH quality criteria. Adv Simul (Lond). 2021;6(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00188-8
Diaz-Navarro C, Armstrong R, Charnetski M, Freeman KJ, Koh S, Reedy G, Smitten J, Ingrassia PL, Matos FM, Issenberg B. Global consensus statement on simulation-based practice in healthcare. Adv Simul (Lond). 2024;9(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00288-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Chilena de Enfermería

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal do so under the following conditions:
The authors retain the copyrights (copyright) and give the journal the right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 that allows third parties to use what is published provided that they refer to the author or authors of the work and its publication in this journal.
This work is licensed under a Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
The use is non-commercial and the article may be modified and distributed, but under the same Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license as the original material.
The authors are free to make other contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article they publish in this journal (such as including it in an institutional collection or publishing it in a book), as long as they clearly indicate the original publication of the work in this journal.
